Drug Driving
- Drug Driving Barrister Melbourne
Facing a Drug Driving charge in Melbourne?
Phil Simpson - 100+ 5 Star Google Reviews
With more than 25 years at the Victorian Bar, Phil Simpson has represented thousands of clients across a wide range of matters. The majority of Phil’s practice is devoted to defending people in the Magistrates’ Court who have been charged with driving-related offences.
Phil appreciates that facing Court can be an incredibly anxious time — not just for the person charged, but for their loved ones too. That’s why he takes the time to walk every client through each stage of the process clearly and without the legal jargon. He will meet with you personally and he is available by phone, text or email whenever questions arise.
Get Expert Advice - Drug Driving Melbourne
Obtaining legal advice about whether a defence exists for your charges is a critical first step. Drug Driving offences are established under Section 49(1) of the Road Safety Act 1986. A finding or plea of guilty carries mandatory licence loss provisions, and the penalties can differ substantially based on whether a person has any relevant prior convictions.
The most frequently charged Drug Driving offences arise under Section 49(1)(bb) and 49(1)(h) of the Road Safety Act.
49(1) A person is guilty of an offence if he or she
(bb) drives a motor vehicle or is in charge of a motor vehicle while the prescribed concentration of drugs or more than the prescribed concentration of drugs is present in his or her blood or oral fluid; or
(h) within 3 hours after driving or being in charge of a motor vehicle provides a sample of oral fluid in accordance with section 55E and
(i) the sample has been analysed by a properly qualified analyst within the meaning of section 57B and the analyst has found that at the time of analysis a prescribed illicit drug was present in that sample in any concentration; and
(ii) the presence of the drug in that sample was not due solely to the consumption or use of that drug after driving or being in charge of the motor vehicle;….
Although you may receive a Charge and Summons requiring your attendance at Court, a first offence is frequently resolved by way of a Traffic Infringement Notice. It is important to note that regardless of whether the matter is dealt with by Infringement notice or charge and summons, the mandatory minimum licence loss provisions remain the same.
A person convicted of an offence under 49(1)(bb) or 49(1)(h) is liable to a fine of no more than 12 penalty units for a first offence, no more than 60 penalty units for a second offence, and no more than 120 penalty units for any subsequent offence. As the pattern makes clear, the maximum penalties increase with each Court appearance.
Can I go to jail for Drug Driving?
A conviction for Drug Driving under 49(1)(bb) or 49(1)(h) of the Road Safety Act does not carry a custodial sentence. That said, the Magistrate retains the discretion to assess an offender’s suitability for a Community Corrections Order, which can impose supervision by the Office of Corrections and unpaid community work. Whether a Community Corrections Order is likely depends on a range of factors. If you have prior convictions for Drug Driving offences, it is important to seek advice about potential sentencing consequences as soon as you receive your charge and summons.
Licence Loss for Drug Driving in Melbourne
Upon convicting or finding a person guilty of a Drug Driving offence, the Court is required to cancel any existing driver licence or learner permit and disqualify the offender from obtaining one for a minimum of 6 months on a first offence, or at least 12 months for any subsequent offence.
Licence Loss Exception – Section 50(1F) Legal Medicinal Cannabis
Where a charge arises under section 49(1)(bb), (h) or (i) and the drug detected is a legally prescribed medicinal cannabis product being used consistent with a valid prescription or other authority, there is a possibility of retaining your licence. In those circumstances, upon a conviction or finding of guilt, the court may — rather than must — cancel the offender’s licence or learner permit and impose a disqualification period of at least 6 months (first offence) or at least 12 months (subsequent offence). The key distinction is that licence cancellation is no longer mandatory in these circumstances.
Drug Driving Barristers Melbourne
The inclusion of Section 50(1F) in the Road Safety Act introduced a discretion that previously did not exist. A Magistrate may now resolve a Drug Driving matter without affecting a person’s ability to drive, provided the medicinal cannabis was lawfully prescribed and used in compliance with the prescription or authority.
Melbourne Drug Driving Charges
The discretion does not mean that the offending is lawful — it simply creates a limited avenue for the Magistrate to finalise the matter without interfering with the person’s licece. This remains a discretionary power, and the Magistrate will need to be satisfied about all relevant considerations. If you fall into this category, thorough preparation is essential to give yourself the best chance of a favourable outcome. The right advice and documentation may be what keeps you on the road.
Combined offence of Drink and Drug Driving
The combined drink and drug driving offence is found in Section 49(1)(bc) of the Road Safety Act 1986. Penalties upon a finding or plea of guilty are serious, and vary considerably depending on an offender’s prior history. Mandatory licence loss provisions apply, and the disqualification periods are found in Schedule 1AB of the Road Safety Act 1986.
Drug Driving Law Firms Melbourne
The minimum disqualification periods for combined drink and drug driving are substantially higher than those for drink driving alone, and far exceed the penalties for drug driving in isolation. It is also critical to understand that imprisonment is a possibility for a second or subsequent combined offence. Maximum custodial terms range from 6 to 18 months, depending on prior offending and the level of alcohol detected. The applicable minimum licence loss is governed by whether the offender has committed an offence under Section 49(1) of the Road Safety Act within the preceding 10 years, measured from the date the prior matter was finalised by the Court to the date of the current offence.
Specific Offences
In my experience, people who take the time to understand the process and their available options tend to feel considerably less overwhelmed and far better placed to make sound decisions about how to proceed.
The most common Drug Driving offences under Section 49(1) of the Road Safety Act 1986 are as follows:
- Driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs
- Drug Driving Offences
- Driving while impaired by a drug
- Drink and Drug Driving Offences
- Refusing to undergo a preliminary oral fluid test
Careful preparation of your matter is essential to reduce the impact on your life and livelihood. Seeking advice at the earliest opportunity puts you in the strongest position to achieve a positive result.
Feeling Unsure.. Concerned...
Don't Know Your Options..?
Let's Have A Confidential Chat
Possible Defences to Drug driving
Drug driving Community Corrections Orders
Drug driving Offences Melbourne
Drug driving Jail Sentences
Minimise the potential impact on you and your livelihood
Drug driving Lawyers Victoria
What happens after the Police charge me?
If you have been intercepted by Police in connection with a drink or drug driving matter, reach out by text, phone or email as soon as possible. I can offer preliminary advice and walk you through your options. Once you receive a charge and summons along with a preliminary brief of evidence from the Police, I recommend booking an appointment to discuss your matter in detail.
The Preliminary Brief of Evidence
The preliminary brief of evidence is a formal document served on you by the Police — usually through the post, though personal service is also possible. It contains the charge and summons, the statement of alleged facts, witness statements, a list of exhibits, and the evidence the Police intend to rely on. It may also set out any prior offending alleged against you. If the circumstances of your arrest involved a record of interview, the preliminary brief may include a DVD or CD of that recording. Keep all of these documents somewhere secure.
I will need to review the preliminary brief of evidence before I can provide comprehensive advice about the best path forward.
Pre-Hearing Disclosure
As part of the pre-hearing disclosure process, I will request Body Worn Camera footage directly from the Police Informant. If you have been interviewed by Police or have received a charge and summons to attend Court, please don’t hesitate to contact me by call, text or email.
Drug Driving Experts Melbourne
Being charged by the Police can be a deeply stressful experience
After more than 25 years practising in the criminal courts, I understand that people from all walks of life can find themselves on the wrong side of a drink or drug driving charge. There are many reasons someone might end up before a Court, and I never lose sight of the fact that good people are not immune from difficult situations. Common contributing factors include:
- An uncharacteristically bad decision
- Challenging personal circumstances such as mental-health or family struggles
- A misunderstanding about your rights and obligations
- Peer group pressure
- Addiction
- A lack of understanding about potential penalties
- Being uninformed about the elimination rates of drugs from the body
My goal is to give you the best possible chance of staying on the road
Whatever has brought you to this point, the most important thing now is to get advice from someone with a thorough understanding of the law, the process, and the practical realities of your situation.
When preparing your matter, I will meet with you personally, listen carefully to your account, examine the facts, and advise you on the relevant law. I will also recommend individuals and services who may be able to assist in preparing reports and materials that will assist you to achieve the best possible outcome.
EXCELLENT Based on 108 reviews Posted on Google ChantelTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Our 2 experiences with Phil Simpson have been nothing but exceptional. Phil’s knowledge and professionalism are what got us the results we were hoping for. Thank you so much Phil for the time and effort you put in to help our boys get the outcome we could only wish for. We highly recommend Phil for any legal action needed.Posted on Google NickTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. This is coming from someone who hates lawyers because of recent first hand experience. Phil did exceptional work for me. Within an hour meeting he understood my situation perfectly, and represented me in court so well we reached an outcome neither of us could have imagined. When asked his prices, he gave a simple one sentence answer. No nonsense. It does cost some money but the only thing more expensive than an expensive lawyer is a cheap lawyer. The only bad thing I have to say is he is making me rethink my prejudices towards his profession. I would definitely rely on Phil’s council in the future if need be.Posted on Google AndrewTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I was lucky enough to have a mate that had been in several of the circumstances I found myself in recently, this was not the first time but the first time I reached out further than the abilities that Victoria Legal Aid should have serious concerns about. The legal aid attorney provided me with incorrect timeframes (50% less than the correct penalty) that were before the court today. If I didn’t reach out for an obligation free consultation, I would have represented myself and more than likely responding in a defensive manner that would have made things MUCH worse for myself. This is the person to call for help outside the capacity of family and friends when facing legal matters that have the ability to change your life forever. Thank you so much Phil. You have saved my life in a physical and mental sense. He also helps the community in another way that immediately earnt my respect as a professional and a committed member of the community in such a great way, please see the attached image in relation to that area of help. Regards - Andrew ParkerPosted on Google JunTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Phil’s someone you hope you never need, but when you do all you will ever need. Most lawyers have a grasp of legal matters, the way Phil practices law is the true differentiation. He will guide you through in plain English and more like an old friend than a service provider. Like a friend, he will give it to you straight but in a way that leaves you feeling like he’s got your back rather being handed a new one. A coffee after a milestone, thanks Phil 🙏Posted on Google MarkTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I found myself in a legal situation and after my first contact with Phil, he was very professional, by listening and responding with providing clear, confident understanding of my position and then explained my options in plain terms. He was prepared thoroughly at every hearing and the outcome was better than I could imagine. Thank you again Phil. Highly recommended.Posted on Google BradTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. Had a wonderful experience with Phil, who represented my Client incredibly well and achieved the best possible outcome for him. Everything was smooth throughout the entire process with strong communication or organisational efforts at all times. Court day is where Phil really shone, putting my client at ease and guiding him through the process. Phil is now my first choice for in court legal representation.Posted on Google JiaTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google. I’m extremely grateful for the support and expertise of Phil. He provided clear, confident and highly effective representation. Excellent communication and genuine care throughout the process. Highly recommended.